Tuesday, December 20, 2011
The pitch in the video he posted brought to mind the 1946 All-Star game. I wasn't yet born but I've read about the game. Almost all of baseball's star players had been overseas fighting and now the fans in Boston got to see them assembled for the first time in five years.
Ted Williams never won a World Series, the only one he played in was that October (he went 5-25). His stage was the All-Star game. In his previous game, in '41, before becoming a Marine Corps pilot, he'd hit a walk off home run – though they didn't call them that in those days – to give the AL a 7-5 win.
The American League had its way with the Nationals in '46 though, winning 12-0. Williams already had a home run and three RBI (he'd end up 4-4) by the eighth inning. Called in to pitch for the NL was Pittsburgh's Rip Sewell.
Sewell had started with the Pirates in 1938. In 1940 he was 16-5 with an ERA of 2.40. But then hitters started to figure him out and he lost more than he won the next year. No matter though, for Sewell was very likely to be drafted that year – until he got shot that is.
On December 7, 1941, the day of the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor, Sewell was hunting when a friend accidentally put 14 pellets of buckshot into him. Sewell told a reporter that the blast had torn holes into him the size of marbles. "My legs looked like screen doors." No one knew whether he'd pitch again, but his draft status immediately plummeted to 4-F.
Ignoring doctor's orders Sewell went to Spring Training, pitching in pain and keeping his wounds hidden from everyone but the Pirate trainer. It was lucky he wouldn't be facing the league's top hitters, who were on their way overseas, but his injuries had taken some of the zip off his fastball and the snap off his curve. So Rip came up with a trick pitch, the Eephus pitch. It rose on on a 25-foot arc and slowly dropped over the plate, and it was misery for batters used to swinging at fast pitches.
His first victim in exhibition play started to swing, stopped, started again, and then almost fell down. The first time he threw it in a real game the batter pointed his bat at Sewell and threatened to shoot him. (Been there, done that.) The Cubs manager tried unsuccessfully to have the pitch banned.
In St. Louis Whitey Kurowski spit tobacco juice on the ball as it floated past him. In Cincinnati the Reds shortstop caught the pitch and fired it back at Sewell. (It was still called a strike.) Against watered-down competition Sewell won 17 games in 1942 and 21 in '43 to lead the NL and then another 21 in '44. No one homered off his Eephus pitch.
In the eighth inning of the '46 All-Star game NL manager Charlie Grimm told Sewell to "See if you can wake up this crowd with that pitch of yours." Three singles and two outs later the Splendid Splinter stepped into the batter's box shaking his head from side to side and yelled, "You're not going to throw that damn pitch of yours are you?" Sewell threw it on the very first pitch and Williams swung hard, fouling it off the tip of his bat. Sewell threw it again, but missed the strike zone and Williams never swung at anything out of the strike zone.
Williams had told Bill Dickey before the game that he wasn't sure a home run could be hit on the Eephus pitch as the hitter would have to supply all of the power. On the third of Sewell's trick deliveries Williams took two steps forward – out of the batter's box – and launched the ball into the right field bleachers.
Of course the home run, the only one ever hit off Sewell's special pitch, was allowed to count – in violation of Baseball Rule 6.04 "A batter shall be called out when he hits a ball with one or both both feet on the ground outside the batter's box".
You can see at left that Ted's front foot is out of the box. But you can't ruin a magical moment like that.
You know, I've been spending some time analyzing how the Cardinals won this year's World Series and I think I've figured it out.
Wanna know why the Ranger pitchers couldn't throw strikes?
Take a look at this. Watch the girl behind the catcher as the pitcher delivers. Watch her left hand.
Saturday, December 17, 2011
Thursday, December 15, 2011
Sports franchise owners obviously believe Gordon Grekko's philosophy that greed is good. Heaven forbid that they should ever wait to add new franchises until it is good for the game. There are some obvious factors to consider after all, such as arithmetic (duh) and, in the case of a huge land mass like North America, geography – with the added element of time zones when TV is taken into account.
Then there are continuity, tradition, fan interest, and just plain common sense. The NHL recently did the unthinkable – they actually put some thought into the realignment necessitated by the Atlanta Thrashers' recent move to Winnipeg. And several owners and general managers did something even more unthinkable – they put the league's and the fans' interests ahead of their own. Yikes! What is the world coming too?
Speaking of hockey, perhaps the NHL, whose All-Star game is deadly dull, should adopt baseball's accidentally brilliant strategy of awarding home field advantage to the conference that wins the All-Star game.
For me a basic problem with so many damn teams in all the sports is that you want to build and nurture rivalries but you also want to give the fans a chance to see all the stars from time to time. But you can't fairly do that in baseball. First, it goes against tradition, something that Selig has buggered up pretty nicely, and second, in baseball the teams don't play other teams once, they play three or four games in a row.
In a completely fair world, teams should play other teams as often as do their rivals. But you can hardly have everybody playing all of the teams in the other league (to keep things equal) three or four times, there would be no time left to play the teams in your own league. Again – too many flipping teams!
It's really too bad that so many things have to act like pendulums, swinging so far each way. In hockey for decades you had just six teams and many top players spent their careers in the minors. Then the NHL moved much too quickly to 12 and you had a lot of bums playing in the league. The players were treated like slaves and then thanks to expansion (and briefly the WHA) the players had all the power. The majority of NHL players are from small towns in Canada and almost none of the people who live there could ever afford to go see the kids play after they get drafted.
In baseball you had just two out of 16 teams in the post-season and just one round of playoffs. It was downright silly in the early 1950s when three teams from the same city (New York/Brooklyn) played in four out of five series. Now you have a bunch of teams in the playoffs and they go into October. (Hockey goes into June now!)
We all need to go MLB's website and suggest changes (or changes back) to the game. Then they should have a draw of the names of all the people who sent in suggestions. Winners would get free memberships in a very exclusive club – the Bud Selig fan club.
My first suggestion for MLB ... erect statues like the one at the right outside every major league ballpark.
Saturday, November 26, 2011
There’s a new collective agreement in place that will mean labor peace for some more years (as compared to the mess in the NBA). There will be a second wildcard position, quite possibly in 2012. The Astros are going to be moved to the AL and play in the Western division. On any day when all teams are playing, there will be an inter-league game.
Let’s disregard the collective agreement, because I don’t think any fans have a beef with that.
Way back in 1997, MLB decided to add one more team to each league (the Arizona Diamondbacks and Tampa Bay Devil Rays). The problems this decision created were major in that each league would have an odd number of teams. There were two solutions: inter-league play extended over the entire season with one team from each league involved. The other thing that could happen was to move one team to another league.
Apparently, Bug Selig, who owned the Brewers at that point, felt that it would be a conflict of interest to have his team move to the NL. So the Kansas City Royals were asked first and declined. Since Milwaukee had been a NL city for 13 seasons (1953-65) when the Braves were in town, it was felt this was the best switch to make. It was also worth a lot of money to the team that moved. Gee, I wonder why this all happened this way?
So from 1998 until the end of this past season we had two unbalanced leagues with the AL West easily being the best place to be because you had only three other competitors to beat in your division instead of four – or five if you were unlucky enough to be in the NL Central.
My big question to all parties concerned is why this was allowed to happen in the first place? It created a patently unfair situation for all teams. The solution to the situation was obvious: either don’t award franchises to Arizona and Tampa, or wait until four franchises could have been awarded.
Now let’s look at the fallout of this latest decision.
It’s been decided to move the Houston Astros to the AL Central, thus putting both leagues back into balance – exactly the same place MLB was during the off-season of 1997 when the two new teams were added! Now I don’t know about you, but if I were a Houston fan, I’d be pretty pissed off about this.
We’re now going to have inter-league play spread more thinly over the entire season, the decision that was shot down in 1997. So why is it the correct decision now? Nothing has changed?
I have been against inter-league play from the beginning because the number of games between teams in each league had to drop. Not only that, but the schedule also changed to pit teams from each division against each other more often. In divisions like the AL east, this puts the “lesser” teams like Baltimore, Toronto and, until recently, Tampa Bay at a distinct disadvantage against the division’s two powerhouse teams, New York and Boston.
It’s going to be interesting to see how the inter-league schedule will affect inter-divisional play next season. Are we going to see even few games between our teams and teams from other divisions? That would hurt the game a great deal, in my opinion.
My basic feeling is that MLB made a big mistake creating only two new teams in 1997. It should have been four or none at all. With the continuing juggling they're only painting over the initial mistake that was made.
Time has born out that one of the decisions for a new franchise was a poor one. The Tampa franchise is floundering badly – not out on the field, certainly. They’ve been able to compete toe-to-toe with Boston and New York for several seasons now. It’s at the gate where they’re hurting. Even when they were in the World Series in 2008, I was shocked to see empty seats at Tropicana Field. As they came on so strongly at the end of 2011, thousands of seats went unfilled night after night. The team was forced to sell discounted tickets and waive parking fees in the middle of a postseason drive in an attempt to fill up their stadium. Not a very good sign.
Arizona has been more successful putting bums in seats, but there are several other teams around the league that have been floundering at the gate which means other options could have been looked at back in 1997.
But with Bug at the helm we got a very wrong decision from MLB’s hierarchy and I believe it’s harmed the game, most definitely in the fairness department.
Saturday, November 12, 2011
Sunday, November 6, 2011
With the slowing down of the baseball year while every team tries to figure out just what the hell they’re going to need to do to get to the World Series a year from now, we’ve also decided to go into off-season mode here on Late Innings, too.
“What exactly does that mean?” you might well ask. Well, a few things.
First, you won’t be hearing from Will as often. His historical essays take a fair bit of time to research and write up and he has severe writer’s cramp as a result. He’s going to see Dr. Frank Jobe who has treated nearly all the great baseball sports journalists over the years who have come down with this career-threatening injury. Will may post during his convalescence, but not until he’s given clearance to write off a mound. He promises to be ready by spring training.
John will continue to post sporadically, as well – keeping up his record from the regular season. A man of many words, I know he has a lot of them left over that he’ll need to get rid of before spring training starts in the new year.
Me? You’ll have to put up with me since I’ll probably post most Saturdays.
But now our big announcement! We’d like to invite you, our faithful readers, to be guest off-season writers for us. Do you have any interesting baseball thoughts you’d like to share? A favorite team? Player? Something you want to gripe about? We’d love to offer you our soapbox. Please contact me directly at firstname.lastname@example.org and I’ll tell you everything you need to know.
Friday, November 4, 2011
He won back to back series with Big Red Machine in 1975 and 1976. He also won with the Tigers in 1984. It has been a year since Sparky Anderson died at age 76.
His style was flamboyant but convivial. “I got good players, stayed out of their way, let them win a lot and then just hung around for 26 years,” said Anderson during a 2000 speech on being inducted to the Hall of Fame. He had some of the greats in the game and he helped them become great. Johnny Bench, Pete Rose, Jack Morris and Kurt Gibson to name just two from each team.
Sparky is the nickname of George Lee Anderson. He got the name from a broadcaster while playing for the Double-A Fort Worth Cats of the Texas League as a shortstop in 1955.
We have Maple Leafs General Manager, Jack Kent Cooke, to thank for Sparky’s involvement with managing baseball. Sparky played for the Triple A Toronto Maple Leafs baseball team. This was after his time in the show in a Dodger’s uniform. Even though Sparky was not a great ball player (fielder, no bat) Cooke noticed he could teach, lead and inspire those around him. In 1964 Cooke hired him to manage the Maple Leafs. (Same team Babe Ruth once played for).
Very quickly Sparky rose thru the managing ranks producing championship teams in each of his four minor league years. The Reds hired him for the 1970 season. They won 102 games in the regular season and then lost in the WS to the Orioles. It was this team that gained the moniker the “Big Red Machine”. It was a name that stuck until 1979. Sparky was hired by the Tigers in 1980 starting another run to the WS. He holds the franchise record for wins by any manager with the Tigers at 1,331.
Sparky is also the first manager to win World Series rings in both leagues. Of course, Dick Williams of the Padres, would have also been the first if they had beat the Tigers in 1984.
Sparky’s style was his “sunny disposition”. Except when it wasn’t. He could dust it up with the best of them, but not often. He treated his players with respect and taught them about the real game and about real life. He did start what is now a common practice. Get to the bullpen. If the starter is not doing well, don’t wait, get the relievers out there. He became know as “Captain Hook”. Tony LaRussa called him a mentor. I guess that is part of what we just saw in this year‘s WS with so many pitching changes for the Cardinals. (What was that? LaRussa brought in a reliever to pitch-out one batter.)
In 2000 Sparky was inducted to the Hall of Fame. His number 10 was retired by the Reds in 2005 and his number 11 retired by the Tigers in 2011. Each Tiger player, this past season, wore his number 11 on their uniform. Sparky is missed by the whole of baseball and its fans.
Tuesday, November 1, 2011
For the record, Cornelius McGillicuddy (you may know him better as Connie Mack) had the most wins (3,731) in baseball history, but his record is tainted by the fact that he lost a lot more (3,948) – for a .486 record. John McGraw, who won just 35 more times than La Russa, had a winning percentage an even hundred points better than that. McGraw’s .586 trails only Joe McCarthy’s amazing .615, but keep in mind that in McCarthy’s first thirteen years with the Yankees they finished first or second in the AL twelve times.
LaRussa should easily make it into the Hall of Fame. So too should Bobby Cox, whose best-ever 16 playoff appearances is marred only by the fact that he won only one World Series, and Joe Torre, who went to the postseason 15 times, won six pennants, and four World Series.
As for Jim Leyland, who has 1,588 wins and sits in 18th place, he has only three more wins than losses, but he had the misfortune to continue managing the Pirates after they jettisoned their big salaries and he also led the '98 Marlins to an impressive .333 record.
La Russa managed teams to twelve first-place finishes and six pennants, going to the World Series in three straight years with the A’s from 1988 to ’90. He also lost in the Series with the Cardinals in 2004. He often appeared tight-lipped at his post game news conferences, but behind the scenes he showed a sense of humor, often poking fun at his .199 career big league average in a playing career that consisted of 176 at bats over 11 years as a utility infielder.
La Russa has changed the way baseball is played through his use of a number of unusual strategies. He started games with his pitcher batting eighth 432 times and continually used batter-pitcher matchups to determine which reliever to bring in – which unfortunately made major league games even longer and slower. He was one of the first managers to regularly use a reliever – Dennis Eckersley – for a single inning. Of course Herman Franks used Bruce Sutter as a specialized reliever in the late ’70s and the Yankees used Sparky Lyle that way too – and then Goose Gossage, but La Russa refined the practice, trying to ensure that Eckersley would start the ninth with a clear slate by trotting out a parade of righties and lefties to create matchups.
In 1991 La Russa set a major league record with 397 pitching changes, surpassing the record set by Reds manager Pete Rose four years earlier. Of course it was more remarkable in the AL where the existence of the Designated Hitter in and of itself reduces the need for pitching changes. By 1993, his last in Oakland, La Russa was up to 424 changes.
La Russa was getting a lot out of his hitters too. But not because of a shot in the arm from him – because of a self-injected shot in their butts – of steroids. La Russa claimed not to have known about their use, particularly by Jose Canseco and Mark McGwire, but a guy as smart as he is must have. Funny thing ... Mark McGwire hit prodigious home runs and made prodigious use of steroids with another team in another league three years later. Now let me think, who managed that team – the ’96 Cards? Oh ya, that was La Russa again.
So Hall of Fame, yes. La Russa was one of the most intelligent, involved, innovative, competitive, and successful managers of all time and he deserves to be there. But his lengthening of games and his acceptance of steroids loses him quite a few points with me.
Saturday, October 29, 2011
Some personal observations:
I honestly thought that Texas would win it after they came back from game 3, the one I like to think of as The Albert Pujols Show. It demonstrated a lot of backbone on their part. In game 6, by the 6th inning, I thought the series was about over. Was I ever wrong! It’s not often that such a sloppily played game (by both sides) can turn out to be this exciting. Even though I’m not a fan of either team in particular, it was almost unbearable to watch. More than once I thought of two punch-drunk fighters staggering around the ring trying to knock the other out. It’s hard to imagine that the Cards managed to come back not once, not twice, but three times in those last 3 innings. As soon as the game ended, I knew I wouldn’t have wanted to be in that Texas clubhouse. Three blown saves in 1 game. That’s really gotta hurt. How many times were they within one strike of winning? Last night must have been even worse.
Up until game 6, we had some of the best defensive baseball I’ve seen in a long time (see last week’s blog for my choice of the best of the best). How many times were players picked off or thrown out by Napoli and Molina? I wonder if it’s a record for one series. Those are always exciting plays.
I wonder if the use of the bullpen by the two managers is the shape of things to come in regular season games? Once it got past the 5th inning, you could count on at least 8 pitching changes to be made before the game was over. That’s a lot of extra advertising time for Fox. Bet they were happy about Washington’s and LaRussa’s bullpen strategies.
In listening to the ESPN radio broadcast last night, Dan Schulman and Orel Hershiser were talking about the length of this series’ games. One thing they brought up was Fox’s insistence on adding 18 extra minutes to the game through between-inning commercials. Huh? I’m sorry but if MLB needs cash that badly, maybe they should hold a bake sale or host a telethon or something and not make us sit around for that much extra time while Fox makes money off their advertisers. The game doesn’t need this. Between relief pitchers warming up, the general slowness of the game and then the 18 minutes, that makes for one draggy game. I found myself drumming my fingers impatiently several times.
As much as I feel very sorry for Texas, there was a feeling of inevitability about this year’s playoffs – actually the last month of the season. Those Cards started playing great ball in September and peaked at just the right time as they rolled over one team after another. Texas wasn’t beaten by much, and if the pitching had been just a tiny amount better, one pitch better even, they would be getting ready for a victory parade through Dallas this week, instead of having to spend the winter tasting their own bitter bile. I wanted better for Ron Washington, one of the great guys in the game by all accounts.
So, on to the off-season and what promises to be a very interesting time of trades and free agent signings. Wonder who will make the upgrade of the year for 2012?
Thursday, October 27, 2011
The post season is again too late in the year. Even though the season started a bit early, here we are fighting cold, rainstorms and delayed play. All the players’ routines, workouts and preparations are delayed. Fans have to rearrange schedules. The World Series does not come along to your team every year. You want to be there for every game you can.
In ballparks that can be covered, like Rogers Centre and Tropicana Field, games are not delayed, not canceled for weather related issues. It still amazes me that since 1989 more clubs have not opted for some kind of domed stadium. At least clubs playing in extreme climates like the Southwestern and Northeastern parts of the US. Regions that can, at the beginning or end of the season, be too hot or too cold. The arguments will be that baseball should be played outside. I am in agreement except when the weather is too extreme. Close the lid. I’d rather see a game than sit through a long rain delay or cancellation.
At the Rogers Centre, it is a push button operation. After twenty-two years, the dome still closes quickly and silently when needed. It’s quite a marvel. Rain or shine, a game happens. During the WS in 1992 and 1993, weather delays could have produced different outcomes for the Jays. I remember how cold it was outside, but inside the temperature was warm enough to have a proper game. The Jays prevailed and all the postseason home games were played without interference of the weather. The games were won by the skills of the players and managers, not the weather.
Major League Baseball has deemed that in postseason play a game delay would be postponed only, and be resumed later. This adds for a continuity of play. In the past, you started the game over. Now the game and the statistics are contiguous. I think this is an improvement.
If you have ever been to Wrigley on a somewhat blustery and rainy day you can appreciate how much like a sieve that place is. Sure, it a very storied park, but very uncomfortable. Some recent stadiums have come up with different ideas on how to keep the elements out. The Astro’s Minute Maid Park has a retractable lid and grass. Looks good too, with red brick and a train in left field. (I know Rick would like that). The Brewer’s Miller Park most unique feature is its fan-shaped movable roof. It, too, has grass. I know cement is bad for the players and the Jays certainly have a better field with the new turf after replacing the old. But it is still cement. I think it is possible to have grass in most lidded parks. It just takes a different lighting situation and a good drainage system.
Games have always delayed and canceled due to rain or snow. Opening day for the Jays was delayed but played after the field was shoveled. Too cold. As of today, 21 World Series games have been delayed, only one for cold in 1903. Rain check anyone?
In today’s game, or what will now be Thursday’s game, the pitching situation will be much different with an extra day of rest for starters and especially the bullpens, who have done the bulk of the work to date. The managers are pleased. Fans, who intended to see this game, not so much. The strategies will be different with the players not on the same schedule as planned. As Will has said, baseball is not a cold weather sport. When needed, a covered park is the best thing going. Bravo to the Astros, Brewers and Jays for having state of the art parks that assure the show will go on.
Tuesday, October 25, 2011
Saturday, October 22, 2011
Some of each team’s great players are definitely not having good series this year. Hamilton is obviously hurt, and admitted that if this were the normal season, he’d be on the disabled list. Pujols is struggling, too. But that’s to be expected. It’s the end of a long season and people get pretty beat up in six months of hard playing. And some players just hit a slump at exactly the wrong time.
But there are also some players on both teams that have been nothing short of amazing. Case in point: the Rangers’ Elvis Andrus. Have you seen the absolutely jaw-dropping double play he started last night, that I feel ultimately changed the course of the game in the Rangers’ favor. Here it is:
Is that not amazing? Some are comparing it to the incredible catch made by Willie Mays in the 1954 World Series. Look at it below:
Pretty good. Right? Which do you think is better? Mays made a huge play. His throw back to the infield certainly was skyed, but he makes an almost impossible catch and then stops on a dime to make it. The Andrus play from Thursdays game has a lot more subtlety about it. There’s finesse there. The fact that he obviously caught Kinsler, his second baseman, napping and out of the play makes the tail end of this double play even more amazing.
Like I said off the top, if you want to see some great baseball, I get the feeling that this series might be it.
Now watch the next 4 games be complete blowouts...
Wednesday, October 19, 2011
The Cardinals are quite a different story. Among their position players four have played elsewhere: right fielder Lance Berkman for several years with the Astros, left fielder Matt Holliday with the Rockies, second baseman Nick Punto with the Twins, and shortstop Rafael Furcal, who started with Atlanta and then moved over to the Dodgers.
Rzepczynski, a sophomore lefty may have been the toughest player for the Jays to give up. In 28 games, he posted a 3.97 ERA, logging 22 innings, often facing the opposition's best left-handed bats. He gave up three runs in one inning pitched in the Division Series but just one hit and one run while striking out four in five appearances against the Brew Crew. Initially shocked by the trade, he is apparently delighted now. "It's a lifelong dream for me to be in the World Series," he said. "I didn't think I was going to be where I am today, but I can't ask for anything more."
Rzepczynski was given the option of making the Blue Jays roster out of spring training as a reliever or continuing to start for Triple-A Las Vegas. He chose the bullpen and it's turned out to be a good move for him. "If I was still a starter, who knows what would have happened, and for me right now, relieving works".
"I'm glad I came through and do my best for this team, I'm glad where I am right now." So are the Cardinals. The Blue Jays just hope the other end works out for them down the road.
Tuesday, October 18, 2011
The Tigers went 20 and 5 to end the season and took the Yankees 3-2 in the ALDS with what looked like an unstoppable force. Justin Verlander was great and Jose Valverde was perfect. Going into the series with the Rangers, the Tigers looked to be strong from both sides of the plate. And they were strong until game 6.
Game six was the undoing of a great season. It happens, but not quite so dramatically. All the previous games in the series were very tight. Extra innings won the day for the Rangers each time with a home run by Nelson Cruz. Of course the famous no-out grand slam, served up by Ryan Perry, in game 2 will be remembered as a first. And again of course, Nelson Cruz put the bite on again in game 4 to seal the deal. Each of these home runs were pitches in the wheel-house and just asking to be hit. Jose Valverde lost just once this season, and that in his last appearance. He still had a great year.
The situation with the Tigers was that the pitching let them down. Jason Verlander and Doug Fister were strong but other starters had more than enough to handle with the Ranger hitters (all of whom contributed in game 6). Tiger relievers were simply out matched by Ranger hitting. It is interesting to note that Tiger starters Verlander and Fister won games, no starter for the Rangers won a game at all. The relievers did the damage and Alexi Orgando won two from the bullpen.
Game 6 showed a number of problems. In the infamous third inning, the relievers just could not, for example, get a pitch low and away for a strike. Rick Porcello, after the game, complained about a call from the home plate umpire. He might have been right this time, but it did not make up for the walks and hits already given up. Most of the Rangers hits, again, were pitches right in the wheel-house. As far as hitting was concerned, the Tigers did themselves proud. They did hit against Ranger pitching. The Rangers, however, had a field day with Tiger pitching. Ranger hitters got 8 walks, only 4 strikeouts, 17 hits and a BA of .415. The Tigers had no walks, 8 strikeouts and a BA 0f .286 (normally in a playoff series not a bad day).
Walks and errors will kill your chances, as they always seem to score runs. The third inning was also awful in the field. Austin Jackson booted a ball, allowing a hit and everyone was safe. Next came the strange play of Delmon Young who, himself, booted a missed catch and then made an awful throw to home, missing the action allowing 2 runs to score. This is where it really fell apart. If he had made that play, just maybe, the Tigers could have gotten out of the third with one run scored and the inning over.
Jim Leyland has done a good job with this team. It has only two players from the ill-fated 2006 team remaining: Justin Verlander and Brandon Inge. To have this team rise like they did at just the right time was a marvel. In game 6, the collapse was sudden and complete. I guess, all winter, Tiger fans will wonder why Nelson Cruz was not intentionally walked.
My hat is off to the Rangers. They won big. Now, on to the World Series!
Saturday, October 15, 2011
STARTING PITCHING: How many starting pitchers did the Jays trot out this season? I wouldn’t be surprised if it was somewhere north of 15. While many will point their fingers at the bullpen for the reason the team didn’t do better, I’m more inclined to look in the direction of the starting pitching. With 2010 behind us, it was thought the starting 5 would be a real strength of the 2011 team. Sadly, this wasn’t so. Too many of the young pitchers crashed and burned for a variety of reasons, mostly due to inexperience. Still a number of positive things filtered through the clutter. We now know we have a legitimate ace in Ricky Romero who could have easily won 20 games with a bit better luck – and a better bullpen. Henderson Alvarez was a very impressive call-up late in the season. Will the Jays bring in an inning-eating veteran in the off-season? It might be a smart move, but you could also make a case for standing pat and seeing what happens in spring training. With Dustin McGowan now back and throwing with authority (if not the best accuracy at this point), the Jays could have caught lightning in a bottle. Brandon Morrow might figure out how to be consistent.
Bright lights: Ricky Romero, Henderson Alvarez, Dustin McGowan.
Question marks: Brett Cecil and Kyle Drabek. And will the real Brandon Morrow please stand up?
RELIEVERS: Okay, the Jays did sort of shoot themselves in the foot here during the season, trading away Rzepczynski and Jason Frasor for some center field help, but there were big question marks before that happened. Rauch was probably a flyer the Jays took on and it really never worked out. Good move to get rid of Dotel. Shawn Camp sort of swooned late, and once he got back from the DL, Casey Jannsen was terrific. It turned out to be a mistake to try to make Villanueva a starter. He’s probably better out of the pen in the long run. Great move to have Litsch move to the pen. He looked good. Will the real Frank Francisco please stand up? He was just not good early on and then looked great towards season’s end. The Jays have to get a real closer. Francisco may be the answer – if he can continue right on from where he left off, not take half a season to warm up. Maybe they’ll try to get Frasor back. Perez might turn out to be excellent...trade bait.
Bright lights: Casey Jannsen, Jesse Litsch and possibly Villanueva.
Question marks: Camp, Rauch, Francisco and Perez.
BATTING: Wasn’t this an up and down year for the team? At times they were just awesome, unstoppable, a force of nature. Other times, it was more like a Punch and Judy show. Bautista was “as advertised” until that damn homerun derby at the All-Star game. After that he seemed to come down to earth. My big question is will Adam Lind have the stamina to be an everyday first baseman and keep his hitting up? Don’t you all wish that we’d had Brett Lawrie all season? With Encarnacion at third, how could Lawrie have been any worse? Patterson and Rivera are thankfully now gone. Eric Thames has made it difficult for the Jays to stay hot about Travis Snider. What is up with him anyway? Escobar was a real plus at the plate. It is nice to contemplate going with him leading off again, followed by Thames, then Lawrie with Bautista cleaning up. Maybe Lind could bat fifth. If Rasmus does what he seems to be capable of and Arencibia picks up where he left off (and improves his average), the Jays could have a very potent lineup in 2012.
Bright lights: Bautista, Yunel Escobar, Lawrie and Thames.
Question marks: Edwin Encarnacion, second base, Lind and Rajai Davis.
FIELDING: The Jays’ outfield was screwed up through most of the season. Snider bombed, Patterson bombed, Rivera bombed, and Rajai Davis proved he can run the infield, but not patrol center field. We won’t talk about Dr. Strangearm at third base.
But shortly after Larry’s report card, there was a sea change in what the Jays brought to the defensive part of the game. People were moved out and some interesting replacements brought in. Colby Rasmus is a legit center fielder. Thames, God bless him, is working hard to improve his fielding and it shows. We’ve now got the best right fielder in the game back in right field. On the infield, Lind proved he can play first base well, Escobar is dazzling at short, and I think Lawrie is going to really open up some eyes with his second season at the hot corner. Second base is a big question mark. Johnson is smooth turning the double play, but will he be back? Behind the plate, Arencibia did well and should continue to improve. The Jays do need to get their bench strength up, though. Who’s going to back up Arencibia? Will we get Johnny Mac back from Arizona or go with McCoy? Will the real Travis Snider show up next year?
Bright lights: Bautista, Lawrie, Escobar and Rasmus.
Question marks: Thames, Snider and Davis.
The Jays certainly have a lot of young players to use as trade bait and I expect them to use that strength to bring in some veterans to fill the team’s holes, but even if they decide to stand pat, there are a lot of things to be excited about: Lawrie for a full season, Arencibia being able to concentrate more on hitting, Bautista being the superstar for the entire season and some potentially excellent starting pitching. If the team is going to improve from outside, it would be best to concentrate on the bullpen.
The pieces are definitely falling into place.
Tuesday, October 11, 2011
Friday, October 7, 2011
Rick and I went to see the new movie Moneyball this week. For those of you who do not know its story, here is a short synopsis: Bill Beane, the Athletics GM, is forced to go out and gather a competitive Athletics team on the year following an ALCS appearance. When asking for more money to secure his big name players, Beane is told by Stephen Schott, the new A’s owner, that no more money is forthcoming. Jason Giambi, Johnny Damon and Jason Isringhausen are now too expensive to sign. They are gone. He has to find a way to be competitive with the same money. The focus of the movie is all about how to win in an unfair game.
To win, Billy Beane turns his attention to a new and little used set of statistics called Sabermetrics (Society of American Baseball Research), to find undervalued players who can get on base. This system was developed and promoted by Bill James and others. Large market teams, like the Yankees and the Red Sox, can just buy the players they want. Small market teams claim they cannot compete with that kind of cash needed to buy big name free agents. What Billy Beane does is to find others who can contribute to the team for less money. He finds undervalued, but solid, players who can get on base by walk or hit (OBP) and make the opposing pitcher use lots of pitches to do it. For pitchers, Beane looks for those who throw first pitch strikes and have a low WHIP (Walk and Hits per Inning Pitched). It’s not so much about saving money as spending what you have where you need it. All of us who follow baseball closely now rely on these types of stats. Pitchers with a low WHIP are effective and hitters with a high OBP are going to get on a lot, ninety feet at a time. With certainty, so Beane says, "We try to create a situation where we're the casino. It's like how an actuary would set insurance rates. Predictability, predictability, predictability.” It’s boring, but apparently effective.
In the movie, the Athletics have just lost in the ALDS to the Yankees in 2001. Beane steals a guy from the Indians who is the fictitious Peter Brand. Brand, in the movie, is the stats guru. In reality, the character is Paul DePodesta, who actually played baseball in school and indeed did graduate from Harvard with an economics degree. He was already with the Athletics in 1999. The Brand character is the one who has the ready information on each player that Beane chooses. The move to sabermetrics creates conflict with everyone on the staff who has traditional baseball values in mind. This new style of scouting players is totally different than the traditional way. These conflicts get to the heart of the matter in the movie and heads roll as the plans Beane has are not put into action as he wanted by the unbelievers. But things change and the famous 20-game win streak (after a very poor start) is the highlight of this drama.
The Athletics have yet to win a World Series using sabermetrics. They have a positive win/loss record but have not been over .500 since 2006. It could be said that increased use of sabermetrics by other clubs has significantly reduced the number of undervalued players out there. If everyone is doing the same thing, well, then you have to do something else. I wonder what will figure in the statistics next? What will it take to equalize all the money to make the game fair?
This premise for a movie is pretty dry (dealing with statistics) and could have been. With Brad Pitt and a good script, the movie has plenty of drama and the time just flies by as this true story unfolds. There was lots of real baseball talk and action. It was fun to watch and relevant to baseball today. Go see it!
Tuesday, October 4, 2011
Bill James created “the Clint Hartung Award” for amazing rookie flops. There is a good reason for that. The “Hondo Hurricane” was signed for big money by the New York Giants and was a spring training phenom in 1947, promoted as having superstar ability either as a pitcher or a hitter. Playing on military teams from 1942 to '45 he was 25-0 and hit .567. Respected sportswriter Tom Meany said of him, "Rather than stop at the Polo Grounds they should have taken him straight to Cooperstown."
In his first season he managed a 9–7 pitching record and hit .306. In 1948 his stats declined to 8-8 and .179; and in '49 he was 9 – 11 and hit just .190. His career (4 years) E.R.A. was 5.02, his fielding was never good, and reportedly he was unable to hit curveballs. Other than that he was terrific.
Walt Dropo of the Red Sox was the 1950 Rookie of the Year. He batted .322, hit 34 dingers, and drove in 144 runs. The next two years were less spectacular – 11, 57, .239 and 6, 27, .265.
Tom Tresh was destined to be the successor of Joe Dimaggio and Mickey Mantle in center field for the Yankees. Through age 27, the friendly, good-looking Tresh had won the Rookie of the Year Award (1962) and a Gold Glove, earned a top-ten MVP finish, and was on two All-Star teams. His OPS+ that year was 134. Following that, it was 122, then 103, then 89, then 79 and out. And it would be a long wait until Ron Blomberg.
Curt Blefary was the A.L. Rookie of the Year at age 21. He was 6th in the league in OPS+ in both his first and second seasons. From ages 22 through 24, his OPS+ went from 142 to 122 to 89. By the age of 26 he was no longer a regular and was traded four times in a three-and-a-half-year period, bowing out at the age of 29.
Lee Thomas hit 24 home runs in his rookie season. The next year, 1962, he hit 26 dingers, drove in 104 runs and hit..290. He was voted to the All-Star team. In 1963 though, he hit only 9 home runs, and the next year managed just 2. Thomas was traded to the Red Sox, where he rebounded somewhat, hitting 13 homers and then 22. And then he fell flat yet again, managing just ten home runs over his last four exasperating seasons.
It would be hard to fall faster than Cleveland's Joe Charbonneau. He was one of the all-time classic flops, going from media-darling Rookie of the Year to futility and minor league obscurity in just two years. His numbers from 1981 to 1983 were 23, 87, .284; 4, 18, .210; and finally 2, 9, .214. Ouch.
Merv Rettenmund played his way his way into a talent-laden Baltimore outfield (Frank Robinson, Paul Blair, Don Buford) with great performances in 1970 and 1971 (18 homers and .322 and then 11 homers and .318). But he collapsed (6 HRs and a .233 average) and was a mediocre utility man the rest of his career.
Earl Williams started big with 33 home runs for the Braves in '71 and then slowly faded away with totals of 28, 22, 14. 11, 9, and 8. He never knocked in as many as the 97 runs he did his first and second seasons and wound up with a .247 lifetime average.
The NL rookie of the Year in 1989 was Cubbie Jerome Walton. He hit .293 with 23 doubles. Then he hit .263, then .219, then .127. No wonder he spent his last six years with five different teams.
The 2004 AL Rookie of the Year was Bobby Crosby. Remember him and his 22 home runs – and his 145 strikeouts? He mostly just struck out after that – his best home run total after 2004 was 9.
In doing my research for this blog I came across something extraordinary – a season that featured a plethora of talented rookies. I used them to put together a lineup that I think would fare well against the rookies of any other season. The year was 1964 and here are its top rookies:
C - Jerry Grote 1B - Richie Allen 2B – Dick Green 3B – Jim Ray Hart SS – Bert Campaneris
OF - Tony Conigliaro OF - Alex Johnson OF - Tony Oliva OF – Jesus Alou DH – Don Buford
Pitching Staff - Luis Tiant, Mel Stottlemyre, Tommy John, Denny McLain, Mike Cuellar, Rick Wise.
Not too shabby.
Sunday, October 2, 2011
When the last of the evening’s games ended, though, the Braves had given away the tying run in the 9th inning and lost it in the 14th, the Sox ace closer had coughed up the tying and go-ahead runs to the Orioles with 2 outs in the bottom of the 9th, and holy cow, the Yankees let the Rays back into the game with 6 runs in the bottom of the 8th (including bases-loaded walks?!), and a game-tying homer from a Ray pinch hitter who hadn’t hit a big fly since April and whose average was well-below the Mendoza line. In the 12th, Evan Longoria won it with a walk-off homer.
What the heck happened?
Arguably the most exciting wrap-up to a season ever, that’s all. Three of the four critical games were tense, nail-biting affairs, two went to extra innings, one included a lengthy rain delay and one was about as improbable as it gets.
It’s the last I’d like to comment on. What in heaven’s name was Joe Girardi thinking? I kept wondering whether he’d gone back to his office to enjoy a few hands of canasta with his brain trust while his players fiddled. Was he trying to get revenge against the hated Red Sox by coughing up the game? Did he not care how the game ended? Or was he being a petulant baby because he didn’t like the playoff schedule this year? Regardless, he left a pitcher on the mound who obviously didn’t have it that night to let the Rays climb right back into the game. His later comments showed that he didn’t want to use his primo closer and back-end pitchers because he wanted them adequately rested for the first ALDS game on Friday. Huh? For the Yankees, it was a bush league way to play this very important game. It was almost as if he wanted to lose.
I was going to root for the Tigers to win the AL this year. I like the team a lot. After thinking about game 162 for the Yankees, though, I am more inclined to root for the Rays. Wouldn’t it be sweet justice for them to prevail against the Rangers, face the Bronx Bombers for the AL crown – and then whip their butts to take the prize? That would be sweet revenge for Girardi and his managerial el-foldo in Wednesday night’s game in Tampa.
Does anyone else feel that the Yankees could have won this game if Joe Girardi had wanted to?